Science Atlas

How We Know What We Know
Sign In
Text size
100%
Theme
Scientist

Francis Willughby

WILL-uh-bee (rhymes with Willoughby)
Life Sciences

Francis Willughby was an English naturalist who, with his close collaborator John Ray, undertook to classify the natural world by physical characteristics rather than by folklore, myth or alphabet. Willughby's Ornithology, published by Ray in 1676 as Ornithologiae Libri Tres four years after Willughby's early death, was intended to describe all the then known birds worldwide and is credited with founding scientific ornithology. He was elected a Fellow of the Royal Society in 1661 at the age of twenty seven.

Facts
Birth Year
1635 1
Birth DateSourced to the subject's own account
1635-11-22 2
Death DateSourced to the subject's own account
1672-07-03 2
Death Year
1672 1
FieldSourced to the subject's own account
Ornithology, ichthyology 2
Death Place
Wollaton Hall, United Kingdom 1
Nationality
Kingdom of England 1
Notable Work
Ornithologia libri tres 1
Birthplace
Warwickshire, United Kingdom 1
Field
Field (category)
Biology 1
Connections

Founded

Source Francis Willughby (Wikipedia)

Member Of

Source Francis Willughby (Wikipedia)

Works In

Source Francis Willughby (Wikipedia)
In the Other Atlases
Sources
1. Francis Willughby (Wikidata)
  • P570 (date of death): year
    +1672-07-03T00:00:00Z
  • P27 (country of citizenship): Kingdom of England
    Q179876
  • P20 (place of death): Wollaton Hall, United Kingdom
    Q17528596
  • P19 (place of birth): Warwickshire, United Kingdom
    Q23140
  • P800 (notable work): Ornithologia libri tres
    Q60497420
View the Source
2. Francis Willughby (Wikipedia)
Wikipedia
  • Birds section
    Willughby's Ornithology was intended to describe all the then-known birds worldwide.
  • Works In: Ornithology, Infobox, fields
    Infobox fields: Ornithology, ichthyology
  • Member Of: Royal Society, Article text
    Willughby was elected as a Fellow of the Royal Society in 1661, then aged 27. Willughby, Ray,
View the Source
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.