Carolyn Ruth Bertozzi (born October 10, 1966) is an American chemist and Nobel laureate, known for her wide-ranging work spanning both chemistry and biology. She was awarded the 2022 Nobel Prize in Chemistry, jointly with Morten Meldal and K. Barry Sharpless, for the development of click chemistry and bioorthogonal chemistry.
Facts
Birth YearSourced to the subject's own account Birth DateSourced to the subject's own account Connections
Associated With
Additional Source Carolyn Bertozzi (Wikipedia)Lead section, 2022 Nobel Prize in Chemistry co-laureates
Additional Source Carolyn Bertozzi (Wikipedia)Lead section, 2022 Nobel Prize in Chemistry co-laureates
Works In
Additional Source Carolyn Bertozzi (Wikipedia)Lead section, 2022 Nobel Prize in Chemistry
Sources
1. Carolyn Bertozzi (Wikipedia)
WikipediaLead section (entity-description)
Bertozzi was awarded the 2022 Nobel Prize in Chemistry, jointly with Morten P. Meldal and Karl Barry Sharpless, for the development of click chemistry and bioorthogonal chemistry.
Infobox (birth-date)
Born: October 10, 1966 (age 59), Boston, Massachusetts, U.S.
Infobox (birth-year)
Born: October 10, 1966 (age 59), Boston, Massachusetts, U.S.
Works In: Chemistry, Lead section, 2022 Nobel Prize in Chemistry
Bertozzi was awarded the 2022 Nobel Prize in Chemistry, jointly with Morten P. Meldal and Karl Barry Sharpless, "for the development of click chemistry and bioorthogonal chemistry".
Associated With: Morten Meldal, Lead section, 2022 Nobel Prize in Chemistry co-laureates
Bertozzi was awarded the 2022 Nobel Prize in Chemistry, jointly with Morten P. Meldal and Karl Barry Sharpless, "for the development of click chemistry and bioorthogonal chemistry".
Associated With: K. Barry Sharpless, Lead section, 2022 Nobel Prize in Chemistry co-laureates
Bertozzi was awarded the 2022 Nobel Prize in Chemistry, jointly with Morten P. Meldal and Karl Barry Sharpless, "for the development of click chemistry and bioorthogonal chemistry".
View the Source Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.