Hugh Everett III was an American physicist whose 1957 Princeton doctoral thesis proposed the relative state formulation of quantum mechanics, later popularized as the many-worlds interpretation. It holds that the wavefunction never collapses; instead every possible outcome of a quantum measurement occurs, each in its own branching universe, which removes the special, observer-dependent role measurement plays in Niels Bohr's Copenhagen interpretation. The idea drew little attention at the time, and Everett left academic physics shortly afterward for a career in Cold War defense operations research.
Facts
Connections
Held Differently
Quantum Theory, Theories Everett's 1957 relative state formulation, the many-worlds interpretation, holds the wavefunction never collapses and every measurement outcome occurs in its own branching universe, a different account of quantum mechanics from Bohr's Copenhagen collapse rather than a claim that Bohr's equations are wrong; which interpretation is correct remains genuinely unresolved among physicists today.
Source Hugh Everett III (Wikipedia)
Proposed
Additional Source Many-Worlds Interpretation (Wikipedia)History section (edge: proposed-by, Everett)
Sources
1. Hugh Everett III (Wikipedia)
WikipediaLead section
Hugh Everett III (; November 11, 1930, July 19, 1982) was an American physicist who proposed the relative state interpretation of quantum mechanics.
- Associated With: Quantum Theory
View the Source Many-Worlds Interpretation (Wikipedia)
WikipediaProposed: Many-Worlds Interpretation, History section (edge: proposed-by, Everett)Quote, Proposed: Many-Worlds Interpretation, History section (edge: proposed-by, Everett)
MWI originated in Everett's Princeton University PhD thesis 'The Theory of the Universal Wave Function', developed under his thesis advisor John Archibald Wheeler, a shorter summary of which was published in 1957 under the title 'Relative State Formulation of Quantum Mechanics.'
View the Source Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.