Science Atlas

How We Know What We Know
Sign In
Text size
100%
Theme
Concept

Occam's Razor

Formal Sciences

Occam's razor is the principle that, among explanations that fit the evidence equally well, the one that assumes the fewest new entities or the least additional complexity should be preferred. It is named for the fourteenth-century English Franciscan friar William of Ockham, though the underlying preference for simple explanations is older and Ockham himself never phrased it as a single maxim; the Latin tag often attached to him, entities must not be multiplied beyond necessity, was coined by later writers summarising his views. Its philosophical standing is genuinely debated: it is not a law of nature and cannot prove a simpler theory true, only recommend it as the better starting point, and philosophers disagree about whether simplicity is really evidence of truth or merely a practical convenience for working scientists, a live question the Stanford Encyclopedia entry cited here surveys at length.

Facts
Disputed
Proposed By
William of Ockham (traditional, contested attribution) 1
Traditionally credited to William of Ockham, but he never stated it as a single maxim and the familiar Latin phrasing was coined by later writers summarising him; the preference for simple explanations over complex ones also predates Ockham in earlier philosophy, so the attribution is a convenient shorthand rather than a settled origin.
Connections

Belongs To

Source Occam's razor (Wikipedia)

Studied In

Sources
1. Simplicity (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy)
Stanford Encyclopedia of PhilosophyView the Source
Occam's razor (Wikipedia)
Belongs To: Philosophy of Science, Lead, sentence 1
Quote, Belongs To: Philosophy of Science, Lead, sentence 1
In philosophy, Occam's razor (also spelled Ockham's razor or Ocham's razor; Latin: novacula Occami) is the problem-solving principle that recommends searching for explanations constructed with the smallest possible set of elements.
View the Source
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.