Occam's razor is the principle that, among explanations that fit the evidence equally well, the one that assumes the fewest new entities or the least additional complexity should be preferred. It is named for the fourteenth-century English Franciscan friar William of Ockham, though the underlying preference for simple explanations is older and Ockham himself never phrased it as a single maxim; the Latin tag often attached to him, entities must not be multiplied beyond necessity, was coined by later writers summarising his views. Its philosophical standing is genuinely debated: it is not a law of nature and cannot prove a simpler theory true, only recommend it as the better starting point, and philosophers disagree about whether simplicity is really evidence of truth or merely a practical convenience for working scientists, a live question the Stanford Encyclopedia entry cited here surveys at length.
Facts
Disputed
Proposed ByWilliam of Ockham (traditional, contested attribution) 1 Traditionally credited to William of Ockham, but he never stated it as a single maxim and the familiar Latin phrasing was coined by later writers summarising him; the preference for simple explanations over complex ones also predates Ockham in earlier philosophy, so the attribution is a convenient shorthand rather than a settled origin. Connections
Belongs To
Source Occam's razor (Wikipedia)
Studied In
Sources
1. Simplicity (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy)
Occam's razor (Wikipedia)
Belongs To: Philosophy of Science, Lead, sentence 1Quote, Belongs To: Philosophy of Science, Lead, sentence 1
In philosophy, Occam's razor (also spelled Ockham's razor or Ocham's razor; Latin: novacula Occami) is the problem-solving principle that recommends searching for explanations constructed with the smallest possible set of elements.
View the Source Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.