Eugene Nida was an American linguist who developed the theory of dynamic equivalence, one of the most influential frameworks in modern translation studies. Working for decades with the American Bible Society, Nida argued that a translation should aim to reproduce the effect and meaning of the source text for its new audience, which he called dynamic or functional equivalence, rather than reproducing the source text's exact words and structure, which he called formal equivalence, a distinction that reshaped both Bible translation practice and the broader academic study of translation. Nida set out this theory in detail in Toward a Science of Translating, published in 1964, and later in The Theory and Practice of Translation, co-authored with Charles Taber in 1969. Over his career Nida also drew on his broader training as a linguist to analyze the grammatical structures of numerous languages worldwide in support of Bible translation projects, and his componential analysis approach to meaning influenced semantic theory more generally.
Facts
Birth YearSourced to the subject's own account Birth DateSourced to the subject's own account Death DateSourced to the subject's own account Death YearSourced to the subject's own account FieldSourced to the subject's own account Death PlaceSourced to the subject's own account NationalitySourced to the subject's own account Notable WorkSourced to the subject's own accountThe theory of dynamic equivalence in Bible translation, set out in Toward a Science of Translating (1964) 1 BirthplaceSourced to the subject's own accountOklahoma City, Oklahoma, U.S. 1 In the Other Atlases
Sources
1. Eugene Nida (Wikipedia)
Wikipedialead sentence
Eugene Albert Nida (November 11, 1914, August 25, 2011) was an American linguist who developed the dynamic equivalence theory of Bible translation and is considered one of the founders of modern translation studies.
infobox, Born field
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, U.S.
infobox, Died field
Madrid, Spain
View the Source Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.