Elizabeth Fulhame (active in 1794) was an early British chemist who proposed the concept of catalysis and discovered photoreduction, and has been described as the first solo woman researcher of modern chemistry. Her only publication, An Essay on Combustion with a View to a New Art of Dying and Painting, appeared in 1794 and described in detail her experiments on the reduction of metal salts, in solution, dry or in ether or alcohol, using hydrogen gas, phosphorus and other agents, with the aim of making cloths of gold and silver by chemical processes. She argued against both the phlogistic and the antiphlogistic hypotheses. The book was translated into German in 1798 and published in the United States in 1810, the year she was made an honorary member of the Philadelphia Chemical Society. She published as Mrs Fulhame, being married to the Irish-born physician Thomas Fulhame.
Facts
Field
Field (category) Connections
Works In
Source Elizabeth Fulhame (Wikipedia)
In the Other Atlases
Nationality
Also in Geography Atlas: the nationality of this subject.
Source Elizabeth Fulhame (Wikipedia)Lead, nationality united-kingdomQuote, Lead, nationality united-kingdom
was an early British chemist who invented the concept of catalysis and discovered photoreduction
Sources
1. Elizabeth Fulhame (Wikipedia)
Article text, pronoun
the first solo woman researcher of modern chemistry
Lead, field of work
was an early British chemist who invented the concept of catalysis and discovered photoreduction
Lead, nationality united-kingdom
was an early British chemist who invented the concept of catalysis and discovered photoreduction
Works In: Chemistry, Article text, works in chemistry
was an early British chemist who invented the concept of catalysis and discovered photoreduction
In Group: Historical And Foundational Chemists (Pre-1900), Lead, field of work (group placement)
was an early British chemist who invented the concept of catalysis and discovered photoreduction
View the SourceReader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.