Antonio Egas Moniz was a Portuguese neurologist who developed cerebral angiography, a technique for imaging blood vessels in the brain, and is regarded as a founder of modern psychosurgery through his development of the surgical procedure leucotomy, later known as lobotomy. In 1949 he became the first Portuguese national to receive a Nobel Prize, awarded in Physiology or Medicine and shared with Walter Rudolf Hess. His legacy became increasingly controversial by the late twentieth century, as lobotomy came to be viewed as an outdated and harmful procedure, with critics calling for his Nobel Prize to be rescinded.
Facts
Notable Work Field
Field (category) Connections
Member Of
Source António Egas Moniz (Wikipedia)
Works In
Source António Egas Moniz (Wikipedia)
In the Other Atlases
Nationality
Also in Geography Atlas: the nationality of this subject.
Source Egas Moniz, WikipediaLead paragraph of the cited Wikipedia articleQuote, Lead paragraph of the cited Wikipedia article
António Caetano de Abreu Freire Egas Moniz (29 November 1874 – 13 December 1955), known as simply Egas Moniz, was a Portuguese neurologist and the developer of cerebral angiography.
Sources
1. Egas Moniz, Wikipedia
Lead paragraphQuote, Lead paragraph
(29 November 1874 - 13 December 1955), known as simply Egas Moniz, was a Portuguese neurologist and the developer of cerebral angiography.
View the Source 2. NobelPrize.org: Nobel Prize laureate record: Egas Moniz
NobelPrize.orgNobel API laureate record, gender
"fileName": "moniz", "gender": "male"
Nobel API laureate record, prize
"awardYear": "1949", "category": { "en": "Physiology or Medicine",
View the Source António Egas Moniz (Wikipedia)
Member Of: Nobel Prize, Infobox: awards
Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine, 1949
Works In: Medicine, Lead, sentence 1
António Caetano de Abreu Freire Egas Moniz (29 November 1874-13 December 1955), known as simply Egas Moniz, was a Portuguese neurologist and the developer of cerebral angiography.
View the SourceReader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.