Glenn T. Seaborg was an American chemist whose involvement in the synthesis, discovery and investigation of ten transuranium elements earned him a share of the 1951 Nobel Prize in Chemistry. His work in this area also led to his development of the actinide concept and the arrangement of the actinide series in the periodic table of the elements.
Facts
Birth DateSourced to the subject's own account Death DateSourced to the subject's own account Death PlaceLafayette, United States 1 BirthplaceIshpeming, United States 1 Field
Field (category) Field (category) Connections
Member Of
Source Glenn T. Seaborg (Wikipedia)
Source Glenn T. Seaborg (Wikipedia)
Works In
Source Glenn T. Seaborg (Wikipedia)
In the Other Atlases
Sources
1. Glenn T. Seaborg (Wikidata)
P570 (date of death): year
+1999-02-25T00:00:00Z
P27 (country of citizenship): United States
Q30
P20 (place of death): Lafayette, United States
Q284803
P19 (place of birth): Ishpeming, United States
Q2432500
View the Source2. Glenn T. Seaborg (Wikipedia)
WikipediaLead section (Wikipedia plaintext extract)
was an American chemist whose involvement in the synthesis, discovery and investigation of ten transuranium elements earned him a share of the 1951 Nobel Prize in Chemistry. His work in this area also led to his development of the actinide concept and the arrangement of the actinide series in the periodic table of the elements.
Infobox, Born
April 19, 1912
Infobox, Died
February 25, 1999
Works In: Chemistry, Lead sentence
Glenn Theodore Seaborg ( ; April 19, 1912February 25, 1999) was an American chemist whose involvement in the synthesis, discovery and investigation of ten transuranium elements earned him a share of the 1951 Nobel Prize in Chemistry.
Member Of: American Physical Society, Categories
Category:Fellows of the American Physical Society
Member Of: American Association for the Advancement of Science, Categories
Category:Fellows of the American Association for the Advancement of Science
View the Source Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.