Robert Sanderson Mulliken (June 7, 1896 to October 31, 1986) was an American physical chemist born in Newburyport, Massachusetts, who died in Arlington County, Virginia. He won the 1966 Nobel Prize in Chemistry for developing molecular orbital theory, a framework that describes electrons as belonging to the molecule as a whole rather than to bonds between specific atom pairs. This approach, worked out largely at the University of Chicago, gradually superseded the competing valence bond picture and became the standard language for describing chemical bonding and molecular structure across chemistry.
Facts
Death PlaceArlington County, United States 1 Notable Workmolecular orbital theory 1 BirthplaceNewburyport, United States 1 Field
Field (category) Field (category) Connections
Member Of
Source Robert S. Mulliken (Wikipedia)
Source Robert S. Mulliken (Wikipedia)
Source Robert S. Mulliken (Wikipedia)
Works In
Source Robert S. Mulliken (Wikipedia)
In the Other Atlases
Sources
1. Robert S. Mulliken (Wikidata)
P570 (date of death): year
+1986-10-31T00:00:00Z
P570 (date of death): full date
+1986-10-31T00:00:00Z
P27 (country of citizenship): United States
Q30
P20 (place of death): Arlington County, United States
Q107126
P19 (place of birth): Newburyport, United States
Q54134
P800 (notable work): molecular orbital theory
Q898432
View the SourceRobert S. Mulliken (Wikipedia)
Works In: Chemistry, Lead sentence
Robert Sanderson Mulliken (June 7, 1896, October 31, 1986) was an American physical chemist, primarily responsible for the early development of molecular orbital theory, i.e.
Member Of: Royal Society, Article text
He was elected a Foreign Member of the Royal Society (ForMemRs) in 1967. Mulliken populatio
Member Of: National Academy of Sciences, Article text
Mulliken became a member of the National Academy of Sciences in 1936, the youngest member in the org
Member Of: American Physical Society, Categories
Category:Fellows of the American Physical Society
View the SourceReader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.