Wikipedia's biographical article on Juris Hartmanis, a Latvian-born American computer scientist and 1993 Turing Award laureate. This description is adapted from Wikipedia contributors under CC BY-SA 4.0; changes were made. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
Facts
PublisherWikipedia
URLhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Juris_Hartmanis
Source Typereference
Reliability Tier3
Sources
Juris Hartmanis (Wikipedia)
WikipediaSelf-citation, publisher
Juris Hartmanis (July 5, 1928, July 29, 2022) was a Latvian-born American computer scientist and computational theorist who, with Richard E. Stearns, received the 1993 ACM Turing Award "in recognition of their seminal paper which established the foundations for the field of computational complexity theory".
Self-citation, url
Juris Hartmanis (July 5, 1928, July 29, 2022) was a Latvian-born American computer scientist and computational theorist who, with Richard E. Stearns, received the 1993 ACM Turing Award "in recognition of their seminal paper which established the foundations for the field of computational complexity theory".
Self-citation, source-type
Juris Hartmanis (July 5, 1928, July 29, 2022) was a Latvian-born American computer scientist and computational theorist who, with Richard E. Stearns, received the 1993 ACM Turing Award "in recognition of their seminal paper which established the foundations for the field of computational complexity theory".
Self-citation, reliability-tier
Juris Hartmanis (July 5, 1928, July 29, 2022) was a Latvian-born American computer scientist and computational theorist who, with Richard E. Stearns, received the 1993 ACM Turing Award "in recognition of their seminal paper which established the foundations for the field of computational complexity theory".
View the Source Claims Backed By This Source (17 claims)
This source backs 17 claims across the atlas. As facts: 13 well-attested. As cited relationships: 3 holds. Plus 1 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.
Disposition By Topic
- Scientists, 13 claims: 9 well-attested, 3 holds, 1 general references.
- Sources, 4 claims: 4 well-attested.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.