Wikipedia's article on phlogiston theory, its proponents, and Lavoisier's replacement of it.
Facts
PublisherWikipedia
URLhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phlogiston_theory
Source Typereference
Reliability Tier3
A community edited tertiary reference, used here for the uncontested outline of the theory and its replacement. Sources
Claims Backed By This Source (15 claims)
This source backs 15 claims across the atlas. As facts: 10 well-attested. As cited relationships: 3 holds. Plus 2 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.
Disposition By Topic
- Sources, 5 claims: 5 well-attested.
- Theories, 5 claims: 3 well-attested, 1 holds, 1 general references.
- Articles, 3 claims: 2 well-attested, 1 general references.
- Scientists, 2 claims: 2 holds.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.
View At A Past Year
The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.