Science Atlas

How We Know What We Know
Sign In
Text size
100%
Theme
Theory

Cosmic Inflation

Astronomy

Cosmic inflation is a theory in physical cosmology describing an episode of exponential expansion of space in the very early universe, which supercooled the universe until the energy driving the expansion condensed into hot, dense particles in a process called reheating.

Facts
Proposed YearSourced to the subject's own account
1979 1
Proposed BySourced to the subject's own account
Alan Guth 1
Connections

Belongs To

Cosmology, Disciplines
Source Cosmic Inflation (Wikipedia)

Proposed By

Alan Guth, Scientists
Additional Source Cosmic Inflation (Wikipedia)Early inflationary models section (edge: proposed-by, Guth)
Sources
1. Cosmic Inflation (Wikipedia)
Wikipedia
  • Lead section (entity-description)
    In physical cosmology, cosmic inflation, cosmological inflation, or just inflation, is a theory of exponential expansion of space in the very early universe. This enormous expansion supercooled the universe and ended when the energy content of the field driving inflation condensed into hot, dense particles, a process called reheating.
  • Lead section (proposed-year)
    Inflation was first proposed by particle physicist Alan Guth in 1979 while investigating the problem of why no magnetic monopoles are seen today.
  • Lead section (proposed-by)
    Inflation was first proposed by particle physicist Alan Guth in 1979 while investigating the problem of why no magnetic monopoles are seen today.
  • Proposed By: Alan Guth, Early inflationary models section (edge: proposed-by, Guth)
    Guth proposed inflation in January 1981 to explain the nonexistence of magnetic monopoles; it was Guth who coined the term inflation.
  • Belongs To: Cosmology, Lead sentence
    In physical cosmology, cosmic inflation, cosmological inflation, or just inflation, is a theory of exponential expansion of space in the very early universe.
View the Source
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.